TMRS: TERACODE Multi-path Redundancy System

A Paradigm Shift in Resilient IoT Control Architecture

“Minimalism isn't a constraint — it's a strategy. Simplest is best.”

In one of our earliest conversations, we considered why many IoT solutions rely heavily on brokers (MQTT) and message queues. The conclusion was that these rely on 3-tier or broker-based topology as a band-aid for NAT traversal and network unpredictability, which is an inherent limitation of modern consumer networks — not a true architectural advantage. Our stance is that this is a step backward, not forward. TMRS aims for a stateless transactional model, effectively bypassing NAT by initiating from the device side, while shedding the overhead of maintaining a connection or state.

We also embrace a design philosophy that any device can be added or removed at any time without requiring system-wide reconfiguration. This flows from the fact that commands are idempotent (redundant "on" commands cause no issue), and the system is stateless. By consolidating logic into a single request-response cycle, we eradicate entire classes of concurrency and synchronization bugs.

Finally, our design principle extends beyond technology to an operational philosophy. We maintain minimal overhead and maximum clarity in service operation. Every service is treated as a building block that can be individually tested, replaced, or scaled in the field.

TMCD modules (≤$20 materials cost) typically consume less than 1 watt of power, making them ideal for large-scale, energy-conscious deployments. This ultra-low power footprint also ensures that the total operational cost of a TMRS-based control system remains minimal, even at scale. Compared to conventional PLC-based architectures, TMRS can often be deployed at less than one-fifth the investment cost, enabling widespread adoption even in cost-sensitive environments. Moreover, due to their low heat generation and passive thermal profile, TMCDs are inherently more reliable for long-term continuous operation compared to traditional PLCs, which often require active cooling and scheduled maintenance.

The network can be Wi-Fi or RS485, or both. TMRS allows each TMCD to continue operating even if one channel fails. In TMRS, RS485 and Wi-Fi are each supported depending on the nature of the sensor or control target. Both are bus-oriented networks, which means multiple TMCDs can coexist on the same bus without needing complex coordination. Some devices only support RS485, while others only support Wi-Fi; TMRS accommodates all of them simultaneously, without requiring a single, universal medium. We also enable underclocking on small, energy-efficient microcomputers to ensure stable, long-term operation in remote environments.

Our protocol, TMCP (TERACODE Multi-path Control Protocol), is a binary format engineered for deterministic behavior and bandwidth efficiency. While compact and binary at the core, TMCP is often wrapped in JSON for visibility during debugging or integration testing. Its stateless design aligns with modern RESTful paradigms, but unlike typical REST-over-HTTP APIs, TMCP ensures all command logic and context are encapsulated in a single transaction.

POST /tmcd/state HTTP/1.1
{
  "id": "tmcd-042",
  "temp": 22.3,
  "co2": 400,
  "status": "normal"
}

Response:
{
  "command": "open_vent",
  "parameters": { "duration": 20 }
}

This stateless request-response design also simplifies debugging and deployment — each TMCD is effectively a client behind NAT that can always contact the server, and the server simply replies with commands. There is no ‘always-on’ connection or broker to manage.

Fault Tolerance by Nature

Conventional failover architectures depend on orchestration frameworks (e.g., Kubernetes), leader election protocols (e.g., RAFT, Paxos), and heartbeat mechanisms. TMRS sidesteps all of that by treating redundancy as an architectural primitive, not an operational add-on. There is no master/slave or primary/secondary configuration — every TMCD is equal and autonomous, reporting its state and acting on instructions with zero inter-device negotiation. Failover is automatic and implicit: any functioning TMCD ensures service continuity.

This becomes particularly powerful when scaling. For instance, adding a third or fourth TMCD in an environment does not require changes to code or configuration files. The new board simply starts sending sensor data and receiving commands. We have used this approach to run large deployments of TMCD boards, each costing no more than $20 in materials that each manage a subset of relays and sensors. The moment a new board is plugged in, system reliability increases, because now there’s one more device capable of executing the same commands.

Our architecture also accounts for variable environment conditions. RS485 lines might be prone to interference in some factories, while Wi-Fi might be disrupted in remote farmland. By supporting multiple communication layers, we ensure that these boards can keep reporting. Meanwhile, underclocked microcomputers can operate for years with minimal power consumption and heat generation. Every design choice focuses on real-world resilience rather than theoretical performance.

Another major benefit is Plug-and-Play I/O boards. Our hardware (TMCD) can be a removable, hot-swappable module. The local machine or bus simply sees them as identical participants in the control loop. In short, we aim for a scenario where no single device is essential, and where redundancy is not an afterthought but an emergent property of the system.

Key Features vs. MQTT / Broker Systems

Many IoT solutions rely on MQTT to unify devices under a central broker. While this solves NAT traversal, it introduces a single point of failure and additional overhead (stateful connections, QoS, sessions). We consider this design approach a technological step backward for mission-critical deployments that need guaranteed operation even under partial network failure.

FeatureMQTT / BrokeredTMRS (Stateless Transactional)
Broker Required Yes No
Persistent Socket Yes No
Scalability Limitations Broker capacity, config Highly scalable — new boards can be added without limits or reconfiguration
Network NAT Handling Indirect (broker) Direct, device-initiated
Config Overhead Moderate None (Plug & Play)
Idempotent Commands Not guaranteed Guaranteed
Redundancy Cost High Low ($20 or less in materials / unit)
Failure Mode Entire system depends on broker uptime Multiple devices, no single point of failure

In real deployments, brokers can fail or require complicated clustering, creating additional overhead for IT teams. By contrast, TMRS has no central aggregator: the server is stateless, simply returning commands on each request.

Applications & Field Impact

We have deployed TMRS in diverse scenarios, from remote farmland insect farms (like mealworm or vertical microgreens) to industrial conveyor automation. The principle is always the same: If you can send a single HTTP POST, you can receive a control command back. This ensures universal compatibility and drastically lowers deployment friction. In real-world deployments, TMRS-enabled systems have achieved over 99.99% operational uptime with a typical message response time under 150 ms across varied network conditions. Multiple installations now operate in regions with intermittent connectivity — including agricultural valleys and semi-industrial remote plants — maintaining uninterrupted local operations even during WAN outages.

Smart Agriculture

In climate-controlled greenhouses, multiple TMCDs manage fans, heaters, misters, and CO₂ vents. These boards operate independently, so partial outages never shut down the entire system. Sensor data is polled every few seconds, and commands are delivered in the same transaction.

Remote Energy Systems

In microgrid deployments, controlling inverters, battery switchovers, or load shedding can be life-critical. TMRS ensures that if any subset of boards remains powered, the system continues operating. No broker or external cloud is needed, so even if the link to the outside world fails, local boards can still coordinate with the server.

Facility Control

Large corporate campuses or manufacturing sites often have thousands of endpoints (lights, HVAC, power, security). Instead of relying on a single central message queue, each TMCD periodically checks in and acts on returned instructions. Rolling upgrades? Hot swapping? All easy, because we never break a long-held connection.

Disaster Tolerant Environments

Because TMRS does not assume continuous connectivity, it can survive in disaster zones. Satellite or cellular uplinks may appear and disappear without warning, but every device that can periodically send a request will do so. Whenever it receives a response, it updates its operational state. If that’s not possible, it keeps its last known instruction.

Business & Engineering Outlook

TERACODE does not build for demonstrations. We build for deployment. Our systems run in the field — 24/7, unattended, embedded. TMRS is designed to last, to scale, and to simplify. We do not chase complexity; we eliminate it. This is not minimalism — it is focus. A system that can handle the hardest constraints gracefully.

Our representative once joked, "In an age where microservices multiply, we actually reduce services." We run everything on underclocked microcomputers or equivalent boards. We turn off unneeded peripherals to reduce heat, energy consumption, and potential vulnerabilities. If a single board fails, the rest carry on.

Beyond the technology, we aim for a mindset shift: what if IoT did not revolve around vendor-locked clouds and brokers, but simple, direct interactions that scale naturally? TMRS is that shift. It’s not an alternative, it’s a reinvention of the fundamental assumptions behind device networking.

As we move forward, we envision further enhancements: hardware crypto accelerators on TMCD boards for end-to-end encryption, built-in failover intelligence, and real-time decision logic. Yet none of these features will deviate from our stateless transactional foundation.

Final Remarks

Ultimately, TMRS is a testament to what can happen when you strip away complexity, remove single points of failure, and design protocols around robustness from the ground up. For the typical IoT or control system, it achieves reliability that rivals multi-million dollar industrial setups — at a fraction of the cost.

This journey was deeply influenced by the founder’s 35-year background in programming and systems architecture. Having contributed to control systems spanning factory automation, military-grade reliability protocols, and large-scale urban infrastructure, he holds multiple registered patents in control networking and embedded fieldbus integration. TMRS reflects that expertise — a system designed not only to function, but to endure in the harshest, most failure-prone environments.

If you’re looking to build a zero-downtime, zero-headache, zero-broker environment for your next-generation control system, we welcome you to connect with us. Whether you need 10 or 100 boards, TMRS seamlessly integrates and scales to your needs — no overhead. Just pure, unstoppable logic.

Explore more TMRS case studies and field deployments through our team — we're here to support your mission-critical goals. And remember, the best technology is the kind you hardly ever notice — because it just works.